Skip to content

Chris Butler

Converting an arcade target to the C64

Chris Butler’s C64 conversions include Commando and Ghosts ’n Goblins. His contemporary interview describes learning the machine, choosing display methods and working towards an arcade game’s defined target.

Chris Butler programmed Commodore 64 conversions of Commando and Ghosts ’n Goblins. His 1986 interview with Gary Penn describes the work as a sequence of choices about what the home computer could reproduce and how to represent it.

An arcade conversion supplied a defined target, but not a ready-made C64 implementation. The graphics, objects and timing still had to fit a different machine.

Arriving with useful knowledge

In The Butler Did It!, Butler recalls moving to C64 work at Alligata with 6502 experience from the BBC Micro. That knowledge transferred at the processor level; learning the C64’s graphics and other facilities remained a separate job. He identifies Hyper Circuit as his first C64 game.

His later work at Elite included Commando. The interview describes a hurried schedule and the need to coordinate the program with music. That is testimony about this production, not a reliable basis for treating every conversion as the same development process. (ZZAP!64 17, pp. 104–105.)

The same issue reviews the released Ghosts ’n Goblins separately. Keeping the review and interview distinct lets each do its own job: one records a critic’s response to the result, while the other explains the programmer’s account of making it.

Choosing a representation

Butler tells Penn that he preferred the defined challenge of a conversion to inventing an original game. Even then, matching the visible arcade action meant choosing techniques suited to the C64.

His discussion of Space Harrier is especially revealing about the evidence. In September 1986 he describes a proposed character-graphics method. It was a plan for a forthcoming conversion, not a benchmark or a description proven by the finished release. The proposal shows him asking which display mechanism could carry the effect before committing to how it should look.

That question connects his work with character graphics and the broader practice of arcade conversions. The important translation happened between the arcade scene and the home machine’s available building blocks.

Sources

  • Gary Penn, “The Butler Did It!”, ZZAP!64 17, September 1986, pp. 104–105: contemporary participant interview. The Space Harrier discussion is explicitly prospective.
  • ZZAP!64 17, September 1986, pp. 18–19: contemporary Ghosts ’n Goblins review, separate from Butler’s account of development.

Checked. Verified against primary sources and signed off by a person.